Archive for August, 2010

ZOMBIE ANTS

Just a reminder that truth is always stranger and that Nature is capable of horror far beyond our imagination.

The oldest evidence of a fungus that turns ants into zombies and makes them stagger to their death has been uncovered by scientists.

The gruesome hallmark of the fungus’s handiwork was found on the leaves of plants that grew in Messel, near Darmstadt in Germany, 48m years ago.

The finding shows that parasitic fungi evolved the ability to control the creatures they infect in the distant past, even before the rise of the Himalayas.

Doesn’t this sound like a great plot for a novel?

The fungus, which is alive and well in forests today, latches on to carpenter ants as they cross the forest floor before returning to their nests high in the canopy.

The fungus grows inside the ants and releases chemicals that affect their behaviour. Some ants leave the colony and wander off to find fresh leaves on their own, while others fall from their tree-top havens on to leaves nearer the ground.

The final stage of the parasitic death sentence is the most macabre. In their last hours, infected ants move towards the underside of the leaf they are on and lock their mandibles in a “death grip” around the central vein, immobilising themselves and locking the fungus in position.

Tags: , ,

TOYING WITH STAR WARS

There are always those willing to take shots at those have been successful, and often it is hard to separate the chaff of sour grapes from the wheat of genuine criticism. But, this interview seems to me to be pretty spot on, and it confirms my observations of the Star Wars movies and their artistic curve.

“Star Wars” was born a long time ago, but not all that far, far away. In 1972, filmmakers George Lucas and Gary Kurtz were toiling on “American Graffiti” in their San Rafael office when they began daydreaming about a throwback sci-fi adventure that channeled the old “Flash Gordon” serials as opposed to the bleak “message” movies that had taken over the genre.
“We had no idea what we were starting,” said Kurtz, who was the producer of the first two “Star Wars” films and also a second-unit director. “That simple concept changed Hollywood in a way….”

There was a bittersweet tinge to Kurtz’s voice, and it’s no surprise. This year is the 30th anniversary of “The Empire Strikes Back,” the “Star Wars” sequel that many fans consider the pinnacle moment in a franchise that has pulled in $16 billion in box office and merchandising. But 1980 was also the year that Kurtz and Lucas realized the Jedi universe wasn’t big enough for the both of them.

“I could see where things were headed,” Kurtz said. “The toy business began to drive the [Lucasfilm] empire. It’s a shame. They make three times as much on toys as they do on films. It’s natural to make decisions that protect the toy business, but that’s not the best thing for making quality films.”

He added: “The first film and ‘Empire’ were about story and character, but I could see that George’s priorities were changing.”

I have always considered Empire Strikes Back to be the best of the films, but I won’t pretend that I haven’t enjoyed all of the movies. I did cringe through the love scenes with Anakin and Padme (“Your skin is smooth like silk…not like sand, which is rough” haha) but there was always enough action and sword fights and sweeping alien vistas to make me feel like my admission cost was well spent. I even loved the Ewok movies as a child.

But what is apparent is that, whatever Lucas may claim, the series was not planned out meticulously from the start. Like a politically driven education curriculum, there has been a great deal of revisionism and forcing things to fit into one narrative. Unlike many movie makers who often have to ignore or gloss over unfortunate omissions and mistakes or inconveniently incompatible plot points when making a sequel or prequel, Lucas can afford to go back and digitally edit out the things that give a lie to his claims of consitency. In fact he is slowly eliminating the need for actors! From digitally enhanced acting in the movies, to his moves to animated and CGI series, the moment he can convincingly generate a human voice there will be a lot of people out of work!

As for the claims that merchandising influenced the plot, may I introduce Exhibit A: Jar Jar Binks? What other purpose did that character serve than to give children something to laugh at, well other than to drive adults mad with frustration? It’s harsh but when he got his tongue stuck in the pod turbine I was so hoping it would get turned on and he would be shot out in a ball of green slime. Exhibit B would be the Ewoks, after all it was originally meant to be the Wookies in Return of the Jedi but they aren’t quite as marketable.

Saying all that, you can’t diminish the success or the entertainment value of the Star Wars franchise, it has brought a lot of joy to a lot of people. My problem with Lucas is his claims that it is something it is not (oh an the truly horrendous and evil philosophy underpinning the mythos…but that is a post for another day, when I will attempt to prove the real villain is Yoda).

Tags: , ,

The week in review

Well, the last week has been crazy busy. We have had the AGM of the cricket club that I am Secretary of, and the finals are in full swing for the Association for whom I am also Secretary. Yes, I am a sucker for punishment!

Our Club has a real mission focus, and an interesting stat leapt out. Of the 66 players who took the field for the Club in the 2009/2010 season, the Club was the only connection with any church whatsoever for 18 of them, while another 20 or so had only a limited connection. To me, that makes all the hard work worthwhile. Unfortunately our existence is under threat (another reason why I have been so preoccupied) so your prayers would be appreciated. The fact that we are building relationships in the local community and attracting people for whom church is not the norm makes it a ministry worth fighting for.

While I have been occupied with all that, there has been another Christian Carnival. so head on over and check that out. I am very excited and honoured to inform you that I will be hosting on Sept the 15th!

I also have confirmed some guest preaching gigs in the next few months, and I will try and get recordings up as they happen. But, live is always more fun so if you can be there, I would love to see you.

Sept 19th – Ringwood Salvation Army 6pm. Theme: “The World needs Heroes” (feel free to come in costume)

Sept 26th – Traralgon Salvation Army 10am. Theme: TBA

Oct 10th – Traralgon Salvation Army 10am. Theme: TBA

Nov 21st – Traralgon Salvation Army 10am. Theme: TBA

Dec 12th – Traralgon Salvation Army 10am. Theme: TBA

Tags: , , , ,

REVIEW: EX-HEROES

EX-HEROES – by Peter Clines

When I read the blurb for this book and saw it was super heroes vs zombies, I have to admit that I didn’t expect much in terms of quality. I thought I would read the sample chapter and then forget about it. Never have I been happier to be proven wrong. Not only did I buy the full copy and devour it, I have read again since and it is one of my favourite books.

Most zombie novels tend to dwell on the aftermath of the zombie apocalypse and with the day to day life of those who survived, but the author cleverly uses flashback chapters to illustrate the extent of upheaval of society, without letting it bog down the main story. It also fleshes out the characters, so instead of two dimensional comic book heroes you get a real sense of personality and of strengths and flaws.

While the heroes do echo some of the more famous ones you would have been brought up on they are not just fascimiles slightly modified to avoid copyright infringement. They are cleverly constructed and would be worth a comic book of their own.

There is definitely no shortage of action, and not just fights with standard zombies, it is more than just a splatter fest. You really get a sense of their rising despair as the heroes fought to stop the zombie plague and save the world, their regrets at failing, the cost to them as heroes and as people. But, you also will end filled with what super heroes are all about, hope.

I will be going into this further in a future post, but there is one speech which really shows that the author understands what a hero is, and what they symbolise.

The book features some clever twists in the plot, the origin of the virus for one, and some bits that will make you laugh and some that nearly made me cry.

If you love super heroes and zombie novels and well written books…buy this book. I really want to read more set in this world, so hopefully there will be a sequel soon forthcoming.

The author, Peter Clines, also has an excellent blog on writing that is well worth checking out.

Tags: , , ,

THE APOLOGIST’S CREED

Ever since I became a Christian I have loved to discuss and debate the many beliefs and doctrines of Christian faith. As I progressed in my own spiritual journey, I began to see the need for a reasoned defense of Christianity in a world that is increasingly hostile to the Gospel, and so I, as many do, tried my hand at apologetics. Like most of us, I have my ups and downs, my successes and failures. But all throughout this time, there has been one verse of Scripture that has both inspired and convicted me, and has been the guiding impulse of my apologetics ministry. It is an extremely well known verse, and I think if apologists had a creed, this would be it. Surprisingly, it does not come from the great apologist Paul but from the man that Jesus called His Rock.

But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behaviour in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.

1 Peter 15-16

There are three lessons to be drawn from this that aid us in our mission to serve God as apologists, and I wanted to briefly examine each of them.

1. But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord.

It seems pretty obvious that to be an effective apologist, you need to be a Christian yourself. However, I think that this goes a little deeper than that. The first part is that if you are going to go out and engage in debate about Christianity, and come into contact with other creeds and philosophies we need to make sure that our faith is deeply rooted and strong. There have been times when I have been struggling in my Christian walk where I have decided to take a step back from apologetics until I get things sorted out for myself. There is no one more unconvincing than someone who is unconvinced himself.

But, this verse (to me at least) is talking about more than just that. If we are to be successful apologists we need to ensure that in every debate we are in, in every piece we write that we are submissive to the primacy of God. It may just me, but I often find that there is a temptation to rely too much upon my own intellect (such as it is) and to try and do apologetics under my own power. But, I know that there is no point in me looking at a subject and trying to apply my common sense or preconceptions to it and then try and pass it off as what God has to say about it. Not only is that arrogant and presumptuous, it ignores the fact that I am a flawed and imperfect human and more likely than not to get things wrong.

We need to be aware that no matter how brilliantly reasoned and constructed an argument we set forth, if it not underpinned by what God has to say on the subject it is worse than useless and does the Kingdom no good. Apologetics is not about us. It is not about how clever we are, or how many sceptics we can confound, but about God and what He has to say on a subject. And how do we know what God has to say? We need to go to His word, to the Bible.

So, the first key to apologetics is putting God and His Word first, and submitting our intellect to Him.

2. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.

When I was, briefly, a Scout the motto was “Be Prepared” and that is a motto that apologists could do well to take for themselves. One of the romantic images that we often like to apply to apologetics is of a knight going off to battle. It is, after all, a spiritual conflict that we find ourselves in, so perhaps that is not so far off the mark. But, we have to remember that in a real battle a knight who went off to war without the proper preparation would soon find himself minus a few essential parts of his anatomy. For every few minutes spent in the heat of combat there were hours of training, on learning to wield the weapons with which he was equipped and honing the knightly skills which were all that stood between him and ignominious death.

While none of us are facing death, at least not in the Western world, the stakes we are fighting for are far higher than a few acres of dirt, and may have a bearing on the eternal fate of others. Surely, then, it behooves us to prepare ourselves just like any knight, and take it as seriously? As apologists I believe that we need to spend time ensuring that we are always prepared.

There are numerous ways that we can ensure that this is the case. The first and foremost is to become as familiar as possible with our chief weapon, the Word of God. We need to always reading our Bible, trying to understand it more and more everyday. By its very nature, it is not like any other book where it is static and limited in the knowledge it can impart. If we are Spirit filled, every time we read it God will show us something new. I don’t know how many times I have read a verse that I believed I knew backwards only to find another meaning in it that I had never seen! There is also much to be said for studying those who have gone before. It is such a true statement that we stand on the shoulders of giants, and we are fools if we believe that we are in this alone. When we run into a difficult argument, the chances are that a hundred Christians have written on it before. That doesn’t mean that we can’t add something to the debate, but it means that we have a starting point.

We also need to make sure that we are constantly seeking to improve our knowledge and learning. There is no point in us seeking to debate on a topic if we don’t know anything about it. How can I, for example, try and engage someone on evolutionary theory and apply Biblical teaching to it if I know nothing about it? You can’t do it, and you only make a fool of yourself if you try. So, in that case it would be worth reading up on it, and making sure that you were coming from an informed position, That doesn’t mean you agree with it, just that you know its weaknesses and where to start from.

We need to be people of prayer, constantly asking God to give us the right words and the right timing to be effective, and also to open the hearts of those we are debating. Again, if we try and rely on our own strength and don’t ask God for help, we will fail.

Finally, we also need to be constantly honing our skills. Like a would-be author, write, write and write some more. Talk and debate with other Christians. Like a knight training with his fellows, spend time working out what areas you need to work on in a friendly environment before you go out to battle where those weaknesses will be seized upon and used against you.

3. But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behaviour in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.

It is a sad fact that we often confuse gentleness with weakness and respect with agreement. But as apologists, these are qualities which we need to cultivate we if want to be effective in carrying out God’s mission.

Because of the nature of the subjects we are discussing, it not unusual for debates to be passionate, or to even get heated at times. Now, there is nothing wrong with a bit of passion, in fact I think that it is required. But, we shouldn’t let it blind us and blunt the effectiveness of our witness. If a debate degenerates into a slanging match it isn’t going to achieve anything, because you can’t have dialogue in that case. Sometimes I find it very hard to maintain my temper in the face of certain arguments, especially those that are derogatory towards the one I love above all, Jesus Christ. But, I find that by remaining calm I can be far more effective than when I let my temper run away with me, as I often get drawn into statements that, on consideration, I would not have made. And, as Proverbs 15:1 says, “A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” Sometimes, the easiest way to defuse an argument that is distracting from the real point or to calm someone down to the point where dialogue can resume is to simply not give any reason for offence, and to end it before it can escalate. It doesn’t mean agreeing, but just being “gentle”. You don’t have to meet an angry word with an angry response, in fact if you don’t you take the wind out of their sails more effectively than any pithy comment might do because it is hard to keep abusing someone who simply won’t retaliate.

As I do in my day-to-day life, when engaging in debate I try (and I stress “try” because too often I fall short) to be obedient to the Golden Rule. I try and put myself in the shoes of my opponent and try and see where they are coming from. For example, it really frustrates me when people assume that because I am a Christian I haven’t thought out my beliefs and they are devoid of reason. So, I always try and operate under the assumption that my opponent believes what they believe in good faith having thought it through and assessed the facts. Because I don’t like it when people attack me instead of my arguments, I try not to engage in ad hominem attacks. And so on, there are many examples of what I mean and I am sure that you can think of some. You would be surprised how effective the Golden Rule is in any human interaction, and apologetics is no exception.

We need to understand that the person we are debating is not our enemy, and we are actually doing this for their benefit. If we lose sight of that, we are wasting our time. I don’t get involved in debates with people because it is going to get me into Heaven, I do it because I believe that they, or the people who are influenced by them are missing out on something because of their mistaken beliefs and I want them to experience the same joy and abundance of life that I do. I am not so arrogant that I believe that I can cause anyone to be saved, but any small part I can play in breaking down the barriers against Christian belief is worthwhile. It may be by answering and individual’s objections, or combating certain philosophies, the thing is I will never know what seeds I might plant. But, when I lose sight of why I am doing it and stop loving those I debate then I may as well give it away.

Apologists also need to ensure that they are above reproach and that they can always have a clear conscience about the way that they go about it. We need to hold ourselves to far higher standards than others do, and never fall into the trap of believing that the end justifies any method. There seems to be an entrenched attitude amongst certain Christians that if we are doing things for God, then all things are permissible. A classic example is the countless emails that use stories and situations to prove a point or discredit non-Christian arguments. I shudder whenever I receive one that a few moments research would have shown to be false but is still passed off as true. There is nothing wrong with an illustration to prove a point, but there is no excuse for falsehood whether deliberate or through laziness, especially for those of us online who have the luxury of Google or Wikipedia or a thousand other sources that apologists of days past would have killed for. If Christianity is true, it shouldn’t require lies on its behalf, the truth should be more than enough.

Nor should we think that because we do what we do for love not money, that we don’t have to meet the same standards that we expect from the professionals. When we take shortcuts or don’t research or indulge in ad hominem attacks, not only do we discredit ourselves, but we make it that much harder for the next Christian who comes along, who then has to work that much harder to undo the damage. But, if we are above reproach not only do we force our opponents to focus on our arguments as they have nothing about us to grab a hold of, when they do make blanket statements about Christians it discredits them in the eyes of those observing who are often the ones we are most likely to reach. And, aside from all that, if we are offering something to God as our gift to Him, shouldn’t we be endeavouring to give him our best, not just what we can be bothered with?

I could go on for much longer about this one passage of Scripture, but if you have stuck with me this far I won’t ask anymore of your patience. I don’t always live up to the standards I have found in the Apologist’s Creed, nor do I claim to be a great apologist (or even a good one), but I have found the things I have talked about useful to me, and I hope that they will be to you as well. I would welcome any feedback from other apologists, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts.

Tags: , ,