Archive for category Politics

My reflections on the death of Osama

Unless you have been living under a rock for the past few days, you would be aware that after ten years of searching and invasions and war, Osama bin Laden has finally been tracked down and killed.

Unsurprisingly, this has led to an outpouring of celebration across the Western world, especially in the United States. Twitter went crazy with tweets talking about how wonderful this is, my Facebook was plastered with posts celebrating the news.

Now, I want to preface this by saying I am in no way unhappy that Osama is dead. I think he lived by the sword, and died by the sword. He was, both directly and indirectly, responsible for countless death and suffering, and I believe that justice has been served. While I don’t think it will mean a sudden miraculous end to the “War on Terror”, it certainly is a big psychological blow and a step in the right direction.

But, and yes there is a but here, I have to admit that I have been slightly discomforted by the tone of the response I have seen. Something about the concept of taking such joy in the death of another human being, even one as downright despicable as Osama, makes me uneasy and I have been trying to work out why. I have been asking myself, as a Christian should I be happy he is dead.

After a fair bit of thought, I came to the conclusion that, for me at least, that this event should be a time for reflection rather than out and out celebration, and from that reflection came the following thoughts. The are rather random, and I am not really trying to advance any particular agenda, they are just what this even provoked in me, and I hope that they may be food for thought for you, whether you agree or not.

If we become like them, the terrorists have won

One of the themes of J.R.R Tolkien’s epic fantasy The Lord of the Rings is the idea that any victory that results from using the methods of the enemy will, in fact, be a defeat. The heroes could have used the One Ring to defeat Sauron, but in doing so would have merely replaced one tyrant with another.

The temptation in fighting an enemy like Al Qaeda is to adopt their philosophy that the end justifies the means, and be willing to suspend human rights and the conventions of war in fighting them. I don’t believe we are simply fighting for survival, we are fighting to defend a set of ideals, the ideals of equality and freedom that are anathema to totalitarian regimes everywhere, whether theocratic or communist or fascist.

I think, in general, that the West has done a good job of maintaining these ideals and not stooping to Al Qaeda’s level, but Abu Gharib and the like show that it must be constantly guarded against.

The thing that concerns me is that in these celebrations we seem to be becoming like that which we are trying to overcome. If you put footage of the streets of Gaza when a successful suicide bomber fulfils his mission against footage from the parties in front of the White House at the news of Osama’s list, the similarity would be eerie. The only difference would be one group shouting “Allah Akbar” and the other “U-S-A, U-S-A”.

If we end up becoming like them, Osama has won. That was always his goal, to use acts of terror to break down the will of the Western world to stick to their core values and beliefs.

Whatever the provocation, let us continue to show that we are better than that. That’s why, as much as my first thought would have been to bury the body sown inside a pig skin, I applaud the fact the US government buried him at sea. Al Qaeda would have not shown such respect for other cultures.

All humans are of value

As much his acts were incredibly evil, the unavoidable fact we must face is that Osama is just as much a creation of God as any of us, and as valuable in His eyes. It is hard for us to comprehend, we don’t want to think about that, but the Scriptural truth is inescapable, no matter how much we would prefer to forget it.

Osama would have had a mother who loved him, a family who cared about him. There will be people grieving for him right now. God had a plan put in place specifically for Osama’s life. Instead of taking joy in his death, perhaps we should be mourning the waste of a life that could have brought joy to others, instead of suffering.

I have no issue with condemning the actions of someone like Osama. I am no moral relativist, they are indefensible and inexcusable, no matter what he felt was wrong with the world. But, when we start believing that some lives are of inherently less value than others then we have taken a step down the road to the same mistakes that Osama made. All lives are of worth in God’s eyes, whether we think so or not.

Sometimes Christians have to say the unpopular stuff

Immediately after the news was announced my Facebook was covered in celebratory posts, some very vitriolic. However, one stood out, where a Christian friend asked whether it was right to rejoice in any death. Immediately it attracted a lot of adverse comments, and I am sure she knew that would happen. But, she did it anyway, because she felt it was the right thing to do.

Christianity is a counter cultural religion. We forget that when we get tied up in the world and its politics, but it is not meant to be of this world. Its truths are timeless, but the world’s are ever changing, and that means that there will be times they come into conflict. It is hard to say things that run contrary to popular opinion, especially an emotive subject like this, but we can’t value the good opinion of those around us more than we value speaking the truth. If you agree with the celebrations that is one thing, but not speaking up for fear of being condemned is another thing entirely.

We have to take responsibility

I don’t believe that there is any excuse for acts of terrorism, or the Western world “deserved” 911 or any of the other terrible events. There is no justification for the deliberate targeting of civilians. So, what follows is in no way condoning that.

But, as Christians, we need to ask ourselves how is that that a good chunk of the world has been reduced to such hopelessness that they believe that the only answer is to follow such men as Osama Bin Laden and look to them to improve their terrible circumstances? Hard as it is to believe, there are people right now congregating around the site of his death and mourning him as a hero, a champion of the oppressed. Evil men like Osama use the fact that we live in a world with a massive gap between the haves and the have nots, where the poorest person in Australia is better off than the average person in some of these countries, to attract people to their banner with promises of a better life and a fairer world.

What are we doing to make the world a better place, a place where false messiahs like Osama would have no way of exploiting the suffering of others to further their agendas? If we have the Truth, if we really do have a better system to offer (and I believe we do) why are there so many who have no access to it?

Why when voices cry out “Help us!”, “Free us from tyranny” and “Feed us, we are starving!” it is not us who answer but men like Osama? We need to take a hard look at ourselves and answer those questions.

As I said, I do believe that Osama’s death is an act of justice, and a positive step for the world. I can understand how those who lost loved ones in the acts of terror that he had a hand in feel a sense of relief that he was brought to justice, and I certainly don’t judge them for celebrating. But, for the rest of us I really can’t see how the death of anyone, even him, should bring an outpouring of celebration. Instead, we should reflect on how the world has gotten to the point where his death was necessary, and what we can do to change it.

Osama was no victim, he reaped the consequences of his actions and I have no sympathy whatsoever. And, I have to point out, that despite the thoughts I am sharing here, my first reaction was one of jubilation. I am only human after all. I do think, though, it is helpful to actually think about these things instead of just going with current of emotion swirling about in the wake of Osama’s death.

I would love to hear your thoughts, so feel free to comment below.

Tags:

Free trade: Your morals for their money

Isn’t wonderful that our former Prime Minister wanted to forge stronger ties with China? After all, trade is so important. So important that we can’t let little things like this get in the way.

A pregnant woman in south China was detained, beaten and forced to have an abortion just a month before her due date because the baby would have violated the country’s one child limit, her husband said on Thursday.

Construction worker Luo Yanquan said his wife was taken kicking and screaming from their home by more than a dozen people on October 10 and detained in a clinic for three days by family planning officials, then taken to a hospital and injected with a drug that killed her baby.

Family planning officials told the couple they weren’t allowed to have the child because they already have a nine-year-old daughter, Luo said.

The Chinese government are a bunch of human rights abusing, free speech suppressing and child murdering barbarians and we should be shunning them, not trying to become better friends with them.

Tags: , , ,

Same old Lizard of Oz

Well, this is typical Paul Keating! You would think most people beating a simple red light ticket would either show a little humility, or would simply move on, but to Paul Keating it will hopefully be a force for social good.

I think it’s important that ordinary people in the community, having received an infringement notice for an offence they didn’t commit, basically understand that the system is not loaded against them,” Mr Keating said outside Downing Centre Local Court in Sydney.

“They’re entitled to have the courage of their convictions and I hope some social good will flow from today’s outcome.”

I mean, really, you would think he had been arraested protesting for civil rights or something, rather than having been pulled up by the cops and deciding to throw his weight around because he was in a hurry.

Now, you may think I am being a little harsh, but I can’t stand Keating. I saw what “the recession we had to have” did to the country town I grew up in, and it makes me sick how at every opportunity for a sound bite he pops up to take credit for the economy or anything else that is good about Australia. In my humble opinion, Australia took a long time to recover from the mess he created and the directions he decided to steer the nation.

It’s good to see his legacy of deposing sitting Pirme Ministers has lived on though!

Tags: , ,

The Big Issues

Sometimes I wonder whether we deserve democracy. After the “Great Debate” where we get to hear our prospective leaders articulate their stance on vital issues, what is the public’s focus? Julia Gillard’s earlobes.

I am not a fan of Julia Gillard at all, but for a start I think it is cruel and cowardly for random people to hide behind the distance and anonymity the internet provides and dissect her appearance. Secondly, this shouldn’t be about people’s looks but about whether they should be running the country.

People complain about politicians but I can’t help but think that we get exactly the government we deserve,

Tags: , ,

Grande Chile!

From Slashdot:

Chile has become the first country in the world to approve, by 100 votes in favor and one abstention, a law guaranteeing net neutrality (Google translation; Spanish original). The law states [submitter's translation]: ‘No [ISP] can block, interfere with, discriminate, hinder, nor restrict the right of any Internet user of using, send, receive or offer any content, application, or legitimate service through the Internet, as well as any activity or legitimate use conducted through the Internet.’ The law also has articles that force ISP to provide parental control tools, clarify contracts, guarantee users’ privacy and safety when surfing, and forbids them to restrict any liberty whatsoever. This is a major advance in the legislation of the country regarding the Web, when until last year almost anything that was performed online was considered illegal.

This is the sort of law I would love to see in Australia. One that takes step to protect people from seeing things they don’t want to (or want their children to), but does not try and limit what information users can access. It’s getting close to the correct balance.

There are two massive threats to our online rights in coming years. One is that providers may seek to limit user access to competing products and information, the other that governments may try and decide what information they want their citizens to have access to. Chile is moving in one direction, and Australia in another. Sadly, I think we are moving in the wrong way.

Tags: , , ,

boo.com

It’s hard to sympathise with their complaints.

BEIJING — A Chinese government-backed think tank has accused the U.S. and other Western governments of using social networking sites like Facebook to spur political unrest and called for stepped-up scrutiny of the wildly popular sites.

Newsflash to the Chinese government: The reason why Facebook and sites like it foment unrest is because it allows people to express their views, and freedom of expression is to totalitarian governments like Kryptonite is to Superman. It’s why I oppose censorship even of viewpoints I find repugnant.

Hopefully the Australian government continues to backpedal on a similar issue. Governments should not control what information people can access, it’s as simple as that.

Tags: , ,

Cricinfo Roundup of Howard Rejection

I think I have written enough on this but here is a roundup of Cricinfo’s coverage of the ICC rejection of John Howard. Make sure you check out the quotes!

“The mess is not about politics, or principle, or anything but power. The worst elements at the ICC were scared of Howard and found a reason to stop him before he became strong.” – Peter Roebuck

Tags: , ,

More on the Howard issue

I referenced Gideon Haigh’s excellent piece about the issues around John Howard’s nomination as Vice President of the ICC here, and he has written a scathing follow up piece which you can read here. I especially liked his conclusion.

Let’s give Bvute some credit. While others cower, he is prepared to stand by his cock-eyed thinking. But if his remarks can be taken as indicative of attitudes at ICC, then its members have given up trying to be FIFA, a body acting in the international interests of its sport, and are content to be a tenth-rate United Nations, all piss, wind and parish-pump politics. Can it get worse? I’m sure ICC is up to the challenge.

Watch the comments section after his article for the knee jerk reactions and name calling, it should be very entertaining.

At least Cricket Australia and Howard are showing some balls.

Tags: , , ,

Another glorious chapter in the ICC annals

What a farce. As usual, power politics and petty self interest have won the day. I liked this quote from Malcolm Speed (yes, the same Malcolm Speed who was sent on “gardening leave” because he ruffled too many feathers in the wake of Pakistan’s forfeiture of a Test).

“Howard has been rejected because his appointment would provide ICC with strong leadership that would thwart the ambitions of several current administrators to downgrade and devalue the role of the ICC,” Speed wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald.

“Howard would have stood in their path. The role requires strength of character – a leader, diplomat, statesman and politician. The ICC board is as political as any political party. The countries that voted him down want a compliant figurehead who will do their bidding.”

I think Australia should really ruffle some feathers and nominate Andrew Symonds for the post, but in all seriousness, if they don’t decide to boycott the process (which they should) they could do much worse than Mark Taylor. He has proved the pick of the former captains in his post cricket career. He would bring a great cricket brain and a love of the game, and the BCCI certainly couldn’t criticise his cricketing credentials!

There will no doubt be lots of coverage of this on Cricinfo, and you can already read Sambit Bal’s editorial here, but something tells me the fallout of from this isn’t over, not by a long shot.

Tags: , , , ,

The Case for Howard

Those of you follow cricket news would be aware that there is currently a furious debate going on about John Howard‘s nomination as the new vice-president of the ICC. To be honest, I wasn’t surprised that it raised the ire of certain groups in world cricket, but it still makes me angry.

Gideon Haigh, whom I consider the greatest living cricket writer by a long distance, has written a brilliant article for Cricinfo which really says it better than I ever could.

I get sick of the casualness with which the word racist is bandied around. When someone’s default defense or attack against things that they don’t agree with is to accuse the other side of racism, it cheapens the meaning of the word.

I certainly didn’t approve of everything John Howard did as Prime Minister but I never thought he was a racist. I remember watching Meet the Press when a journalist insinuated that Howard would care more about children who had died when a boatload of asylum seekers sank had they been white British children. I have never seen Howard look more furious, I thought he was going to have a stroke. If he was feigning that he was in the wrong career!

The only thing I would add is that I think what will make Howard a great president for the ICC when the time comes is what was his greatest strength and greatest weakness as Prime Minister. Howard, no matter what else you might say about him, was always willing to do what he thought the right thing was regardless of public opinion or popularity, to make the hard decisions rather than just obey the spin doctors. From gun control to the War in Iraq he never shirked from pursuing the course of action he believed in. He was one of the few people brave enough to condemn Mugabe at CHOGM, getting called a racist for his pains. It’s funny that cricket led the way in sanctioning South Africa during apartheid, but was so reluctant to do the same to Zimbabwe. A cynic might think it had something to do with race, but of course it wasn’t. Right.

If he becomes head of the ICC, Howard will not pander to special interest groups or respect the powerful cliques that have formed. Cricket is a source of riches and power for certain groups and they have no desire to see things change. Howard will not respect the status quo, he will do what he thinks is right for the game he loves (and there is no doubt he loves it) regardless of who it upsets or how many rackets it disturbs. What has he got to lose? Once you’ve run a nation what is the ICC? There are powerful groups and individuals who know that someone like Howard leading the ICC is a threat to their cosy arrangements. Maybe that is what they are scared of.

Tags: , , , , ,