Posts Tagged Gideon Haigh

I’ve said it before..

…but I will say it again. Gideon Haigh is the the greatest living cricket writer, and one of the all time greats. Not only does he fiercely champion Test cricket as the paramount form of the game, but he refuses to compromise by pandering to the dominant forces in world cricket and hands out criticism equally, not just to one or two groups. Sadly, I feel that the jingoism prevalent amongst many fans (one only has to read the comments on Cricinfo to see what I mean) means he doesn’t receive his due, because people cannot accept comments critical of their nation or team – even when they are true. There are famous cricket writers who seem to write their articles to appeal to the lowest common denominator, fortunately Gideon Haigh is not one of them. This article is well worth reading. And for those who accuse him of bias against India, the following quote:

Number one today is India, which is a happy event, because they also happen to be the most attractive team to watch. And for all the hypermodernity of Indian cricket, MS Dhoni’s team is full of genuine five-day cricketers, not jumped-up one-day players and Twenty20 non-entities. Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Virender Sehwag, VVS Laxman, Zaheer Khan, Dhoni himself, would succeed in any age; when you watch them excel at their craft, time seems almost to stand still. That is an illusion, as you realise when you range back over the generations and grasp the way that the leading teams of their time have been just that: creatures of their time. But it’s an appealing and warming illusion, and a comforting one to nurture at the pub.

It’s not the Indian team, or India itself, that he scorns, it is the BCCI who certainly deserve it. There are lots of people who can’t differentiate between criticism of the BCCI and criticism of India the nation, which I think says more about them than about Mr Haigh.

Speaking of wonderful cricket writing, I came across an article today that I had to mention. I didn’t necessarily agree with it all, but there was one phrase that stood out. I often do that in books, it’s like watching a cricket match and seeing a perfect on drive or a brutal pull shot, you just sit back and admire the skill and artistry that goes into, the joy of a craftsman at work. This was an equivalent moment.

Yesterday we had the ultimate cricket pathos of Sachin Tendulkar, the Little Master still pursuing his 100th international century, polishing a little diamond of an innings among the Indian rubble. He hit boundaries of exquisite quality, he explored the best of what is left of his repertoire and showed us why he has been revered for so long. It was like looking at a masterpiece hung in an otherwise ransacked museum.

That is good writing.

Dhoni deserves some of the criticism coming his way for the team’s performance, he is captain after all. But, he went up in my esteem a great deal after his recall of Ian Bell, as did the the entire Indian team. You can argue about Law versus Spirit all you want, but it was an edifying moment in a sport that needs all the edification it can get. To me cricket is the noblest sport of all, despite the money grubbing and the politics and all the rest, and it is moments like this (or this) that embody why it is more than just a game. Bravo, India!

Sambit Bal’s article on the event is well worth a read, as well as this one.

Tags: , , ,

More on the Howard issue

I referenced Gideon Haigh’s excellent piece about the issues around John Howard’s nomination as Vice President of the ICC here, and he has written a scathing follow up piece which you can read here. I especially liked his conclusion.

Let’s give Bvute some credit. While others cower, he is prepared to stand by his cock-eyed thinking. But if his remarks can be taken as indicative of attitudes at ICC, then its members have given up trying to be FIFA, a body acting in the international interests of its sport, and are content to be a tenth-rate United Nations, all piss, wind and parish-pump politics. Can it get worse? I’m sure ICC is up to the challenge.

Watch the comments section after his article for the knee jerk reactions and name calling, it should be very entertaining.

At least Cricket Australia and Howard are showing some balls.

Tags: , , ,

The Case for Howard

Those of you follow cricket news would be aware that there is currently a furious debate going on about John Howard‘s nomination as the new vice-president of the ICC. To be honest, I wasn’t surprised that it raised the ire of certain groups in world cricket, but it still makes me angry.

Gideon Haigh, whom I consider the greatest living cricket writer by a long distance, has written a brilliant article for Cricinfo which really says it better than I ever could.

I get sick of the casualness with which the word racist is bandied around. When someone’s default defense or attack against things that they don’t agree with is to accuse the other side of racism, it cheapens the meaning of the word.

I certainly didn’t approve of everything John Howard did as Prime Minister but I never thought he was a racist. I remember watching Meet the Press when a journalist insinuated that Howard would care more about children who had died when a boatload of asylum seekers sank had they been white British children. I have never seen Howard look more furious, I thought he was going to have a stroke. If he was feigning that he was in the wrong career!

The only thing I would add is that I think what will make Howard a great president for the ICC when the time comes is what was his greatest strength and greatest weakness as Prime Minister. Howard, no matter what else you might say about him, was always willing to do what he thought the right thing was regardless of public opinion or popularity, to make the hard decisions rather than just obey the spin doctors. From gun control to the War in Iraq he never shirked from pursuing the course of action he believed in. He was one of the few people brave enough to condemn Mugabe at CHOGM, getting called a racist for his pains. It’s funny that cricket led the way in sanctioning South Africa during apartheid, but was so reluctant to do the same to Zimbabwe. A cynic might think it had something to do with race, but of course it wasn’t. Right.

If he becomes head of the ICC, Howard will not pander to special interest groups or respect the powerful cliques that have formed. Cricket is a source of riches and power for certain groups and they have no desire to see things change. Howard will not respect the status quo, he will do what he thinks is right for the game he loves (and there is no doubt he loves it) regardless of who it upsets or how many rackets it disturbs. What has he got to lose? Once you’ve run a nation what is the ICC? There are powerful groups and individuals who know that someone like Howard leading the ICC is a threat to their cosy arrangements. Maybe that is what they are scared of.

Tags: , , , , ,